Current:Home > MarketsWill Sage Astor-Illinois election board to consider whether to boot Trump from ballot over insurrection amendment -Achieve Wealth Network
Will Sage Astor-Illinois election board to consider whether to boot Trump from ballot over insurrection amendment
Surpassing Quant Think Tank Center View
Date:2025-04-08 22:35:41
CHICAGO (AP) — Illinois’ election board on Will Sage AstorTuesday is scheduled to consider whether to keep Donald Trump on the state’s primary ballot after a recommendation that he be removed over the Constitution’s insurrection provision.
The meeting of the Illinois State Board of Elections, which is split evenly between Democrats and Republicans, comes a little more than a week before the U.S. Supreme Court will hear arguments in a similar case from Colorado. That state’s highest court found the 14th amendment barred Trump from the ballot over his role in the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol.
After brief arguments last week, a hearing officer for the Illinois board said it should be up to the courts, rather than election officials, to decide Trump’s eligibility because of the complicated constitutional issues involved. But the opinion from Clark Erickson, a retired judge and a Republican, concluded that a “preponderance of the evidence” presented proved that Trump engaged in insurrection and should be barred from the ballot.
The petition was filed by five voters who argued Trump is ineligible under Section 3 of the 14th amendment, a Civil War-era provision that bars anyone who took an oath to support the Constitution and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion” from holding office.
The attempt to keep Trump’s name off Illinois’ March 19 primary ballot by raising federal constitutional questions is similar to efforts in several other states. The push has notched successes in Colorado and in Maine, where the Democratic secretary of state also recommended removing Trump from the ballot. That decision is on hold pending an eventual ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court.
Free Speech for People, a national voting rights group that is helping lead the Illinois effort, praised the recommendation as “significant” and argued that Illinois law allows the board to make the ballot decision.
“We expect that the board and ultimately Illinois courts will uphold Judge Erickson’s thoughtful analysis of why Trump is disqualified from office, but — with the greatest respect — correct him on why Illinois law authorizes that ruling,” Ron Fein, legal director for the group, wrote in a Sunday statement.
Trump’s campaign has not returned messages seeking comment.
The eight-member Illinois election board is split evenly between Democrats and Republicans. To side with the objectors and remove Trump’s name, a majority has to vote in favor. If the vote is tied 4-4, the effort fails and Trump’s name would remain on the ballot.
___
Associated Press writer Nicholas Riccardi in Denver contributed to this report.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- The Grammy nominee you need to hear: Esperanza Spalding
- Prosecutors urge appeals court to reject Trump’s immunity claims in election subversion case
- Israeli-French hostage recounts harrowing experience in captivity
- Top global TikToks of 2023: Mr. Bean of math, makeup demo, capybaras!
- Nearly 400 USAID contract employees laid off in wake of Trump's 'stop work' order
- After fires, Maui struggles to find balance between encouraging tourism and compounding trauma
- Shirley Bassey and Ridley Scott are among hundreds awarded in UK’s New Year Honors list
- Paula Abdul accuses 'American Idol' producer of sexual assault
- Chuck Scarborough signs off: Hoda Kotb, Al Roker tribute legendary New York anchor
- Paula Abdul accuses 'American Idol' producer of sexual assault
Ranking
- How to watch new prequel series 'Dexter: Original Sin': Premiere date, cast, streaming
- White House says meeting with Mexican president was productive, amid record migrant crossings
- Vehicle crashes on NJ parkway; the driver dies in a shootout with police while 1 officer is wounded
- With hateful anti-trans Ohio bill struck down by Gov. Mike DeWine, hope won. For once.
- Stamford Road collision sends motorcyclist flying; driver arrested
- Ravens to honor Ray Rice nearly 10 years after domestic violence incident ended career
- How Dickens did it: 'A Christmas Carol' debuted 180 years ago, and won hearts instantly
- Frank Thomas blasts 'irresponsible' Fox News after network mistakenly claimed he died
Recommendation
See you latte: Starbucks plans to cut 30% of its menu
Arizona judge denies a GOP move to block a voter-approved law for transparent campaign financing
Kenny Albert takes on New Year's broadcasting twin bill of Seahawks, Kraken games
Our worst NFL preseason predictions from 2023, explained: What did we get wrong?
New Zealand official reverses visa refusal for US conservative influencer Candace Owens
Air in Times Square filled with colored paper as organizers test New Year’s Eve confetti
Shopping on New Year’s Day 2024? From Costco to Walmart, see what stores are open and closed
Pair of former Detroit Tigers scouts sue team alleging age discrimination