Current:Home > InvestJohnson & Johnson proposes paying $8.9 billion to settle talcum powder lawsuits -Achieve Wealth Network
Johnson & Johnson proposes paying $8.9 billion to settle talcum powder lawsuits
View
Date:2025-04-16 02:39:20
NEW BRUNSWICK, N.J. — Johnson & Johnson is earmarking nearly $9 billion to cover allegations that its baby power containing talc caused cancer, more than quadrupling the amount that the company had previously set aside to pay for its potential liability.
Under a proposal announced Tuesday, a J&J subsidiary will re-file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection and seek court approval for a plan that would result in one of the largest product-liability settlements in U.S. history.
The $8.9 billion that J&J would transfer to the subsidiary, LTL Management, would be payable over the next 25 years. The amount is up from the $2 billion that the New Brunswick, New Jersey, company set aside in October 2021.
The revised amount is being backed by more than 60,000 parties that have filed lawsuits alleging harm from J&J talcum powder, according to the company.
J&J isn't admitting any wrongdoing as part of the proposed settlement, a point that company executive emphasized in a Tuesday statement that maintained the claims "are specious and lack scientific merit."
But fighting the lawsuits in court would take decades and be expensive, said Erik Haas, J&J's worldwide vice president of litigation.
The lawsuits filed against J&J had alleged its talcum powder caused users to develop ovarian cancer, through use for feminine hygiene, or mesothelioma, a cancer that strikes the lungs and other organs.
The claims contributed to drop in J&J's sales of baby powder, prompting the company to stop selling its talc-based products in 2020. Last year, J&J announced plans to cease sales of the product worldwide.
J&J's stock rose 3% in after-hours trading Tuesday after the company's announcement.
veryGood! (38657)
Related
- Retirement planning: 3 crucial moves everyone should make before 2025
- Inside Clean Energy: In South Carolina, a Happy Compromise on Net Metering
- Adam Sandler’s Sweet Anniversary Tribute to Wife Jackie Proves 20 Years Is Better Than 50 First Dates
- Reframing Your Commute
- Hackers hit Rhode Island benefits system in major cyberattack. Personal data could be released soon
- An energy crunch forces a Hungarian ballet company to move to a car factory
- André Leon Talley's belongings, including capes and art, net $3.5 million at auction
- Arizona GOP Rep. Eli Crane says he misspoke when he referred to colored people on House floor
- Will the 'Yellowstone' finale be the last episode? What we know about Season 6, spinoffs
- During February’s Freeze in Texas, Refineries and Petrochemical Plants Released Almost 4 Million Pounds of Extra Pollutants
Ranking
- Federal appeals court upholds $14.25 million fine against Exxon for pollution in Texas
- Shopify deleted 322,000 hours of meetings. Should the rest of us be jealous?
- Recession, retail, retaliation
- Many U.K. grocers limit some fruit and veggie sales as extreme weather impacts supply
- A Mississippi company is sentenced for mislabeling cheap seafood as premium local fish
- Republicans Seize the ‘Major Questions Doctrine’ to Block Biden’s Climate Agenda
- Russia is Turning Ever Given’s Plight into a Marketing Tool for Arctic Shipping. But It May Be a Hard Sell
- For Farmworkers, Heat Too Often Means Needless Death
Recommendation
Federal court filings allege official committed perjury in lawsuit tied to Louisiana grain terminal
Noxious Neighbors: The EPA Knows Tanks Holding Heavy Fuels Emit Harmful Chemicals. Why Are Americans Still at Risk?
HarperCollins and striking union reach tentative agreement
Houston’s Mayor Asks EPA to Probe Contaminants at Rail Site Associated With Nearby Cancer Clusters
$73.5M beach replenishment project starts in January at Jersey Shore
California’s Climate Reputation Tarnished by Inaction and Oil Money
EPA to Send Investigators to Probe ‘Distressing’ Incidents at the Limetree Refinery in the U.S. Virgin Islands
Twitter will limit uses of SMS 2-factor authentication. What does this mean for users?